Reflecting on From Here To Awesome
The following is a repost by Zak Forsman director of I F*cking Hate You
To my mind, the biggest problem (as a filmmaker and cinephlie) is that the system is set up in such a way that audiences don’t have TRUE choices for content. The system favors the safe and familiar and “what’s worked before”. I wonder how many cutting edge, iconoclastic filmmakers have been passed over in recent decades because some suit couldn’t reduce their work to “it’s like RoboCop meets Pretty Woman”? I’d like to see this flipped on its head so that audiences have a portal through which they can access a vast array of content on demand and pull it toward them, rather than having distributors push selected content at them. This portal would navigate though a variety of methods including searches, intelligent recommendations, keyword tagging and metadata, and good old word of mouth through a social network that would also allow fans to interact and communicate with filmmakers thru live and recorded video as well as text-based discussion. For the suits reading this, “its like DirecTV meets Amazon VOD meets iTunes Store meets Facebook meets Google meets Video iChat meets Coppola’s Little Fat Girl all packaged into a 60? HD television with webcam, harddrive, and broadband built-in”.
If today we are “Here” and our goal is to get to “Awesome”, i think we are right on the brink of the next “ipod moment” — a moment that changes the way content finds its audience. today’s independent filmmaker is moving closer to what we at Sabi Pictures call the interdependent filmmaker — one who embraces the value of community-based solutions for everything from education and production needs to sharing your audience with like-minded artists. my vision of “awesome” is a universal framework that supports the artist and his or her audience cyclicly. allowing the filmmaker to retain ownership of his or her work is paramount to the evolving models of distribution and I believe that Arin Crumley’s idea for a universal distribution agreement is a brilliant concept for defining a new relationship between filmmakers and outlets. the technology is such that the only thing holding back the low budget (yet equally skilled, compelling and entertaining) filmmaker from monetizing their efforts is an audience equipped with the tools to find them.
Being a part of the first wave of the FHTA project has been a massive awakening and education in terms of elevating my understanding of what can be done with a motion picture once it’s locked and ready for the world. It has emboldened me to truly take ownership of my films, to give myself permission to fail, to assert and define my place in the film world, to brave the ever-evolving models of self-distribution and to have courage in rejecting the conventional route toward distribution for independents such as myself.
the distribution opportunities provided by FHTA were not an end result in and of themselves. they were a door that opened to a whole new journey. I learned to pursue these opportunities with vigilance, to build upon them and to let them inspire new ideas for building an audience. if you’re not pushing your filmmaking forward in some manner every single day, then you’d better go out and hire a great publicist (and a team of interns) to do it for you. that, or turn in your indie credentials right now. haha!
I received a vast “DIY” education from Lance Weiler and Arin Crumley. I now understand how to build and sustain an audience and the importance of creating a framework for the filmmaker to interact and make himself or herself available to the people drawn to the work. I now know the value of transparency and the importance of giving myself permission to fail as I experiment with the newly emerging distribution models. I now know that I’m not alone in wanting to change the status quo by retaining ownership of my work and I know it will happen for us soon. It is only a matter of time, planning and effort.
















October 29th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
true.
October 30th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Zak rocks!
November 2nd, 2008 at 2:04 pm
great article, it’s exciting to learn about all the new resources which are being created for the interdependent filmmaker and the infinite content which will be available to audiences. For the first time audiences will have true freedom.
November 2nd, 2008 at 7:37 pm
Well written article, gives me much hope and makes me excited about the prospects of distribution in the future.
Well done, Zak.
November 2nd, 2008 at 8:25 pm
This kind of distribution is very exciting - it does worry me a bit though, I see a problem with a higher signal to noise ratio - with such an open distribution system I fear that it may be hard to find quality films. One can look at youtube and see that most of the stuff on there is junk.
At the same time though, the opportunity would be tremendous - I’m sure many groups will form to recognize the quality films and help get their names out there…
November 3rd, 2008 at 12:41 am
The most beautiful thing about this is that you are endeavoring to make films that are meaningful in every way, through the creative process AND all the way through “creative distribution”.
I think there is an edge you are all on right now, and the fact that distribution can itself be part of the creative process is the most exciting thing I’ve felt since the first time I picked up a video camera.
I’m learning here, make way.
Kevin
November 3rd, 2008 at 12:24 pm
That’s a good point, Lance. YouTube is congested with “noise” (and viewer count fraud too). So how do we usher in the kind of tools and services that have helped me discover the films i want to see as a member of the audience? It’s not by perusing the weekly list of New Releases, that’s for sure. Nearly every film that has excited me in the past decade -– Lilja 4-ever, Rosetta, The Son, George Washington, Ratcatcher, Morvern Callar, Uzak, Climates, Millennium Mambo, Cafe Lumiere, Three TImes, — has come to my attention through small social networks, discussion forums and mailing lists to be specific. I’ve usually had to take a small leap of faith and import a DVD from the UK or Japan without having seen the film, but I have rarely been disappointed. In my own experience, this kind of online word-of-mouth has been very effective at pointing me toward niche content that is GOOD. It has worked much better than Netflix’s recommendation algorithms. And basically, what happens is, I return to this community thinking, oh what are these people talking about”, “oh that sounds like something I would like”, then I buy it, watch it, and return to that community to engage in the discussion about it. I don’t know if that would work universally for everyone, but it’s a model that works for many.
Anyway, as this “ipod moment” delivery method emerges (and I imagine it’s inevitable), how can we incorporate the appropriate tools and services for the audience to filter out a high signal-to-noise ratio? If our own websites become the new “channels”, can we as content providers network ourselves in such a way that the community in search of niche content has a reliable method to find us… providing we are making GOOD content, in the first place?
November 3rd, 2008 at 3:57 pm
Great article Zak.
November 3rd, 2008 at 4:52 pm
totally agree, Zak. You’re sort of demanding a filmmaking active democracy.